dc.contributor.author | Karlsrud, John | |
dc.contributor.author | Brosig, Malte | |
dc.contributor.author | Maglia, Cristiana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-30T12:06:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-30T12:06:58Z | |
dc.date.created | 2024-09-10T13:35:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3161597 | |
dc.description.abstract | In an era marked by resurgence of great power rivalry and a shift towards a more multipolar world order, global consensus in responding to international security crises poses a growing challenge. While UN peacekeeping operations are in decline, ad hoc coalitions are becoming an increasingly important feature of international crisis response and conflict management. Ad hoc coalitions, defined as autonomous arrangements with a task-specific mandate established at short notice for a limited time frame (Reykers et al. 2023), have multiplied in overall numbers as well as the number of states and international actors participating in them (see Figure 1). This trend reflects changes in global governance. International organizations (IOs) have been seen as ineffective in dealing with a rapidly changing world. In parallel, minilateral clubs, philanthropists and public-private partnerships have taken a larger share of the provision of global public goods in areas like health, digitalization and climate change. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | G20 Brasil | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | T20 Policy Brief;TF06 | |
dc.title | Ad hoc coalitions in international security: The role of the G20 | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Ad hoc coalitions in international security: The role of the G20 | en_US |
dc.type | Research report | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | |
dc.source.pagenumber | 6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristin | 2294638 | |
dc.relation.project | Norges forskningsråd: 314967 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |