dc.contributor.author | Wilhelmsen, Julie Maria | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-17T13:17:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-17T13:17:21Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-09-06T09:55:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2622818 | |
dc.description.abstract | In current popular analysis, Russian foreign policy is explained from within: even in our presentations today, it is Russia’s relations to Europe, to the West, to China etc, that we address – it is not how these entities relate to Russia - As if Russia’s every move can be explained solely with reference to Russia itself. Identity scholarship often has a similar problem: we dissect the articulation of identity in one political entity and then look at what conditions of possibility such identifications create for foreign policy action This is a very useful exercise. But somehow - when watching developments - you get the sense that the processes of othering (-of construing the other as a threat-) in one political entity is tied to such processes in other political entities. We miss something if we study what the states do in isolation from each other. There are probably important interaction effects that we need to take into account if we want to explain the direction of Russian foreign policy. | |
dc.description.abstract | Russian foreign policy and interactiobn effects | |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.rights | Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Russian foreign policy and interactiobn effects | nb_NO |
dc.type | Lecture | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | submittedVersion | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1722151 | |
cristin.unitcode | 7471,11,0,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Russland, Eurasia og internasjonal handel | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | preprint | |